So, Chris Cornell: What's a rock god like
you doing in a electro-funk space like this?
That's the burning question now that Cornell
has released "Scream," a solo album that finds the former Soundgarden
and Audioslave singer teaming up on a club-ready R&B record with
hip-hop hitmaker Timbaland and mood-rock specialist Ryan Tedder of OneRepublic.
The album has been receiving fairly horrible
reviews, and not just from music critics. In a recent Twitter diss,
Trent Reznor wrote: "You know that feeling you get when somebody embarrasses
themselves so badly YOU feel uncomfortable? Heard Chris Cornell's record?
Jesus."
Cornell called to discuss his new project
-- and the reaction to it -- in advance of Sunday's sold-out 9:30 club
concert.
Suffice it
to say that "Scream" hasn't been the most enthusiastically received
album that you've ever made. Has the blowback surprised you, or did
you sort of anticipate it because of where you've been and where this
project was taking you?
I think it's pretty obvious. I did the math
as soon as I made the decision to make that record. But it also depends
on where you go, in terms of how enthusiastically it's been received.
In some places, it's been received incredibly well. If you go right
to the fans that like specifically the more hard-rock side of what I
do, it's sort of an obvious script of that's going to be read, even
by critics.
Does some
of the criticism sting when it's some of your own fans saying, "Hey,
I really don't like what you're doing here"?
No, I would be stupid to assume that they
would like it. I would be stupid to think that everybody would, like,
get into something that's really sort of an electronic rock record.
In terms of its instrumentation, it's entirely different than what they're
used to or what they might even ever want to hear. It doesn't sting
at all. At the same time, there's a huge group of people getting behind
it. Underground DJ culture is tearing this record up, and they're pretty
snobby about what it is that they get into.
From what I hear from other people, this album
is just two years ahead of its time. But that's also still unrelated
to my older fans. As music changes and the landscape of music and the
styles of music that become popular change, it still doesn't mean that
somebody in their 30s that's been listening to me since they were a
teenager is going to like where that goes. This record is just very
different. I completely understand it.
And it's not an ego thing. To me, music shouldn't
be ego-driven. When you go out on stage and play songs, it is. But when
you're sitting in a room, writing songs, it's a completely different
process. It's a completely different place. It's a creative place, a
musical place. It has nothing to do with who likes what. As a fan, that's
something I would be disappointed in; I certainly would not ever want
a band that I'm a fan of to be worried about what I think when they
create what they do. The whole point is that they create what they do,
and then I go into that environment if I want.
So you're
saying that if, I don't know, Trent Reznor, makes an album that you
don't particularly care for, you're not going to go out and blast it?
No. That's kind of childish. To be honest,
if I wanted to go out to blast records that I hate, I would be sitting
on Twitter 24 hours a day blasting 96 percent of what comes out -- maybe
98 percent of what comes out. (Laughs.) There's a lot of music that
I don't like.
But it's not a popularity contest. It's not
campaigning, either. And also, it's not the first time I've been in
this position. When Soundgarden first came out, we were basically part
of -- and wanted to be part of -- this post-punk indie scene in the
U.S. And then we suddenly had this particular moment when he wrote songs
like "Incessant Mace" on that SST record and "Nothing to Say" on the
first Sub Pop record and we were somehow naturally drawing from these
influences of '70s hard rock, which at the time couldn't have been less
popular and less cool. There was tension in that, and we did it anyway.
A lot of people hated it, even people who
were fans of us and had liked what we'd done until then hated it. They
didn't get it. That was exciting, actually. I like that feeling. I like
the idea of not being comfortable, preaching to the choir,
coming out with a new record, seeing people blow up online saying, "This
reminds me of that song from that other record 10 years ago." Ten years
is a long [expletive] time to me. Ten years ago, I made a solo album
["Euphoria Morning"] that was completely unlike anything like I'd ever
done. So I feel pretty great about where I am musically.
It seems like
your primary collaborators worked against you perceptually. Timbaland
and Ryan Tedder are a long, long way from Terry Date and Michael Beinhorn.
That's where that script comes in. It's sort
of like you're supposed to respond that way if you read those names.
It doesn't even allow the music to really have a say. That's the typical
response. And that's the math that I did as soon as I thought about
doing the album. It wasn't surprising at all.
What was the
collaborative process like with those guys?
Ryan, I think I saw for about 10 minutes
in the entire process. We never really worked together. Most of the
time I was working in the studio, Timbaland would come in with an idea.
We'd listen to a beat idea, he'd talk about where he thought it could
go directionally in terms of melodies -- never lyrics, really. He would
do what he'd call coaching: "This is the way I'd approach it." And that's
it; he was done. Then I would write lyrics and sing.
I actually did album-keeper vocals before
a lot of the instruments were played. He would listen to that and bring
in another idea, and we kept working on it like that. As we continued
to go, we'd go back to older songs and would be adding things the whole
time. It was the opposite of making a rock record in that there was
never a band assembled, rehearsing a song arrangement to make sure it
was the way they wanted it. It was the epitome of modern recording.
I was arranging songs up until the final mixes, changing where choruses
and bridges went via editing.
I guess the
point of making a solo album is being able to do whatever you want,
without having to negotiate with your bandmates, right? "Euphoria Morning"
wasn't anything like the Soundgarden albums that preceded it.
Well, I think anybody should be able to do
whatever the hell they want. I'm sure I could start a band tomorrow
that would have different influences and would want to do something
completely different than anything I've done. But yeah, one of the thing
that probably influenced the decision to make this album was: Well look,
if I'm going to go out to be a solo artist, it's because I want to do
something different without having to wait on someone else's schedule
or hobbies or be limited by other people's prejudices. I'd be kind of
stupid not to exercise that. That was definitely part of it.
Since the split-up of Soundgarden, the only
pressure I ever felt was to do something more similar, only more commercial.
I think that's sort of typical if you look at frontmen leaving rock
bands that had big success: Do something similar to what you're known
for, but a little more commercial and that's going to work out for you.
But I never really wanted to do that. I had too much respect for the
band. Even though I wrote almost all of the songs that were radio singles,
that's why I didn't play guitar when Audioslave formed. I thought: If
I'm playing the riff and I'm writing the vocal melodies and singing,
it's not a new thing. So I refused. I did write guitar parts and ended
up writing some whole songs, but for the most part, I stayed away from
it. I just wanted to respond to what they did, and it worked. It didn't
sound anything like Soundgarden, thank god. I was just never attracted
to it.
I think you can create a monster, which is
an audience, and in creating that monster, you find out what that monster
likes to eat, and then you feed it. You do that for your career and
you do really well. A lot of bands and individuals have learned to do
that, but I'm just not built that way. I am someone that listens to
a lot of different music and gets inspired by it. It's a little bit
like you're a sports freak and you like to watch everything: You love
baseball, you love football, you love basketball, you love soccer. And
as you're watching the game, you want to get up and play. I'm a little
bit like that. I'm a fan of a lot of different kinds of music. I don't
feel like there aren't many limitations on me.
Obviously, you're not ever going to hear me
play trumpet. But I'm going to experiment on a lot of different musical
influences and styles. It's just what's exciting to me. What other people
think isn't going to influence it. It never will. And the other thing
-- it almost comes with a resounding "Duh!" -- but I have a 20-year
recording career. I tour a lot because I'm a solo artist and I don't
have to wait for other band members to get off their ass and go out
and perform. I do these two-and-a-half/three-hour shows, where I play
music from my entire career. So I'm playing all of that music that any
critic of this album likes. It's still there. It's as much a part of
my life as it ever has been. In addition to that, I'm playing new music
from my new album, which goes over super-well with some of my fans.
Speaking of
the older stuff: What was your reaction to the news that Kim, Matt and
Ben reunited to perform three Soundgarden songs with Tad Doyle?
I thought it was cool that they'd actually
get together and rehearse some songs. I was kind of surprised by it,
to be honest. [Laughs.] And I love Tad. We toured with Tad; I've always
felt he was a really amazing person and a really talented guy. So I
just really thought it was a cool thing for them to do. They were just
getting up there and doing it for fun, and I think that's great. The
only thing I didn't like is that I wasn't there to see it. If I was
there, I probably would've gotten up on stage.
So at some
point, might we see a Soundgarden reunion?
You never know.
originally available as an online feature
here